You raised an interesting question, as I also see several users who think that simply quoting is enough to ensure that the post is not plagiarized.
But it seems to me that quoting without specifying the author can be mistaken for plagiarism, since not every user has a desire to look for the author. At the same time, it is also clear that the author himself does not want to claim authorship.
Of course, a more convenient option would be to simply add a link, and I don't understand what the problem is with such posters. But I do not consider such posts to be just plagiarism.
Likewise, in parallel with your question, I would like to ask if the font in the copied post is changed and the post has no source, is that considered plagiarism?
As of late, Live Bitcoin News detailed that stages like PayPal and Venmo were looking to conceivably offer bitcoin and cryptographic money purchasing, exchanging, and offering choices to clients. New proof seems to show that these organizations are basically keen on crypto benefits because of bitcoin's transient ascent during the spread of the coronavirus. I read this news through livebitcoin, its genuine folks
PayPal is allegedly looking to allow customers to purchase BTC and other forms of crypto directly with the PayPal app. The company is potentially looking to compete with companies like Square, which has offered this feature to individuals for some time.
Ethereum is growing popularity has largely been attributed to the rising interest in DeFi projects, what's going on? Will ethereum finally be able to leave it's 3 figure value?
The number of daily addresses interacting with ETH has surge in the past 24 hours to a Two Years single day high of 486,000 addresses! The last time Ethereum's address activity was this high was on May 5th, 2018
There have been many topics about plagiarism created, and I do not want to add another one in order to resolve a similar issue. Thanks.