I think there may be a lot of such works that RainbowKun and his alts stole from Chinese sources. I looked at the accounts from my starter post and some have already been punished:
...
caryoscar -
ban evader...
I wouldn't be surprised at all if it turns out that all these banned accounts were caught plagiarizing Chinese articles.
Well let's take care of this one as well.
The question of why Bitcoin is valuable is widely debated. Believers point out that “consensus is value” and there is no need to question its intrinsic value. They believe that from this perspective, gold, which is sought after by traditional secular society, is similar to Bitcoin and has little value in its use. Buffett has never recognized the value of gold, but some people believe that gold has the value of storing value, which represents distrust of other values. Opponents believe that Bitcoin is not currency and has a value of 0. The author does not agree that the value of Bitcoin is zero, but does not agree that this value comes only from blockchain technology, let alone that it comes from blind consensus.
This is a word-for-word copy of a Google translation of a six year old Chinese
article:

Dunno how awesome a DAO filled with cheaters could have possibly been. Was kind of a harebrained scheme to begin win.