What @GeorgeJohn and @mk4 cases are different, that is true a common definition is not a plagiarism, but on @GeorgeJohn thread he multiple times mention unrelated words. If @GeorgeJohn really know how to use Bitcoin ATMs, he should know what the difference between both of scan and scam. Those radars he wrote also doesn't make sense, for me that is he took someone article and translate it without read twice what the google translate wrote.
I have seen that the thread is no longer in its post history. It's strange to me because I thought they were going to the "archival" section. In that section there is a thread:
Deletebut I don't think it's the thread we're talking about, because I think the answers from other forum users would be there.
In any case I agree with lovesmayfamilis:
Well, if this is plagiarism, then there must be a source where it was copied from. I could not find it, and the post is gone. Why excavate the dead?
In my opinion, which does not have to coincide with that of the moderators and Theymos, even if he plagiarized that one time, just that one time, and deleted the thread, no drastic consequences should be taken. Just a warning would do.