So it's very obvious that some a plagarised work can't be detected at the initial point or stage due to know one is after the account then, and immediately the account joined a potential signature campaign a proper Plagiarism test will be carried and if eventually detected a plagarised article or work that has be done for years the user will face panel of judges, so it's educative to isolate a copy and paste articles for reference purposes, and not to be ban, take precautions newbies especially.
When a post is written this badly (see snippet above), I just tune it out completely. OP, even if I could completely understand what you're trying to say, what's your point? What you've written looks very much like an attempt to earn merit. Why? The post is in Meta, where a great deal of merits circulate; it's about plagiarism, which seems to be a trending topic lately (though I don't know why, because it's nothing new); and you've taken a stance--I think--in line with pretty much every merit source and senior member who might have sMerits to give.
We don't need another thread about plagiarism. Members are going to keep doing it, and they're going to become more clever about how they go about it. There's nothing to do but report it when we see it. Period.