Giving someone the choice to get an abortion is one thing. It is very different when people encourage others to get an abortion, to end a life that would not otherwise have ended.
A mother should have all the relevant facts when deciding if she wants an abortion.
An abortion is ending a human life for the convince of another. To encourage an abortion is comparable to ending a human life for no reason, or perhaps for fun.
For fun? I think you might be exaggerating a bit.
It is a tough decision. No doubt. Most women don't want to do it because it is very taxing on the body, or the pregnancies might interfere
with their school or work. Can you blame them? It is not just for convenience like you say. They want to get ahead in life.
Get a better education or get a promotion at work. That is why they might not want to have a baby at that time in their life.
I think women should be the ones deciding it, at least until the fetus becomes viable. At that point, I agree, it is kind of cruel to kill that life.
There is nothing special about terminating a non-viable human (or any other) life; you can make another one in no time. No big deal.
Humans are not some special or endangered species. We are just slightly smarter than chimpanzees.
I would describe someone terminating a pregnancy because it will interfere with school and/or work as being for "convenience". I don't judge them, that is not my place. I also won't sugarcoat what is happening. Both school and job opportunities will still be here after a pregnancy (they will also still be around if the mother decides to take some time off to raise the child, and will still be around for the father if the father decides to take some time off to raise the child).
I doubt that any living being that depends on you for support would appreciate it if you suggested that you could just "make another one" if their lives were to end. This would apply to your dog just as much as it would apply to your child.