But I really don't understand it. 
I already tried to explain this to you in that other topic, but you ignored that too.
Quote
You wrote yourself that you don't know too well how to explain it.
I never said that.
Quote
For me, it is simply a set of inexplicable signs. Unfortunately, this is not something that confirms anything for me. I would love to know how this proves that 1xBit and 1xBet are one company.
Because there is no other logical explanation.
Quote
Maybe there is a programmer here who can explain in some accessible way what it means..?
Ask whatever you want to know. I'm here.
I didn't ignore your answer. I just found it insufficient evidence. But let's try to describe it more clearly .. You said:
Even if the software was purchased (rented) from someone, it still does not explain the usage of identical verification meta tags. It would be like buying a used car and using the previous owner's driver’s license to drive it (there might be a better analogy, but I cannot think of one at this time). Basically, these specific meta tags are used by Google, Yandex, Microsoft, and other services to authenticate domain ownership, and have absolutely nothing to do with software running on those websites.
I found such definition of meta tags:
Quote
Meta tags (also called: meta elements) are used when creating pages in HTML or XHTML. These tags can describe the content of a website precisely. This element enables you to pass on structured metadata via the website. The meta data can vary depending on the description of the desired attributes. Meta tags can be used to describe a page in more detail.
So from what I understand, meta tags "describe the content of a website precisely". Why can't two casinos use the same meta tags? Or in other way - how does the fact that two websites use the same description in your opinion prove that they have one owner?