I'm not doubting your story, just commenting that it's a weird way of doing business.
<snip>
Far too many coincidences to ignore, in my opinion.
Eh? So which is it, my man?
I don't doubt that the address in question (366PvEGTjf1UKWCjZGiPHPyqpFUuNJp9to) belongs to someone other than coriles/vereole. I am, however doubting the excuses and claims that they are not the same person, too many consciences to disregard, including the fact that they used the same "exchanger" who allegedly owns that address.