I don't really see the point of creating a thread to repeat what has already been said... Just in case I'll copy-quote my reply over there:
---
I have to say I'm with you on this one, Ivan.
For starters, giving a negative in September for something that happened in May... it's a bit off from my personal point of view.
To continue, the thread the comment was made into was a Review thread. Reviews can be both good and bad, and since no review was actually made in the end, the whole information from the tag is off. A little bit above Ivans' post, we can also see examplens making this exact point:
I RECOMMEND NOBODY TO JOIN HERE
PEOPLE WHO WANT TO JOIN THE CAMPAIGN WILL BE NEGATIVE TAGGED BY DT MEMBERS PROBABLY
STAY WAY FROM THIS SCAM ORGANISATION
I don't think so. He wants to pay for a review here on the Bitcointalk forum, why not? If someone makes an
honest negative review, you think he should be negative trust punished by DT members?
He said honest review, not shill. I guess they will pay for this job, even if the review does not present them with a positive feeling.
As a side note, I don't think this is a right use of the trust system. I see a distrust on your personal trust list more fitting for this situation, but that may just be my own personal observation.
TLDR; there was no review (negative or positive) so this is just a wild goose chase