The point of creating this thread was to avoid the other thread being overrun with comments about whether a tag was deemed valid or not. It was mentioned in the firsts two paragraphs of the first post in this thread.
I do know how to read but I still fail to make sense out of it.
Ok
You are basically doing an incorrect use of the trust system based on how you perceive things, not on hard evidence and make your own interpretation of the facts.
If you think an incorrect use of the trust system has been applied am I the only forum member you noticed using it? The action you took in this particular case was to post in this thread and state your opposition but have you applied the same vigilance to other forum members you deem to be using the trust system incorrectly or is this only case where you have been vocal?
There is a fine line between hard facts and interpretations of facts, how one sees them is debatable and we all have a right to our opinions.
Asking a casino you don't trust to give some funds so that you can try it on their own review campaign is, from my point of view, not wrong. The casino did later on provide said funds, no review was ever left. There is literally no harm nor ill intention on that.
It is your opinion and you are entitled to it but here are some of us that disagree with that view.
In my opinion (and other members in this thread) the manner in which
iv4n used highly selective text in order to please the 1xbit scammers in the belief it would ensure a $30 payment was not appropriate because it was viewed less as an honest review and more of a
semi-promotion akin to a
shill and he put himself in that position where his integrity and credibility is now being questioned.
Some of those members you listed have already been tagged by me and are on my ignore list so if I decided to skip past them knowing I have already tagged them - I do not think that is a pressing matter. Having said that if you can provide me a link to show where other members have posted a tag worthy promotion or semi-promotion of the 1xbit scammers in the first 2 pages of that thread
~snip
All these users (not yet tagged)posted on the 1-2 pages of the thread how can you say you didn't see it? You merited the reputable members and red tag the less privileged for committing the same crime( according to your words) I see they are all DT members and they will retaliate if you do.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5339885.0As mentioned to you earlier in this thread:
"
if you can provide me a link to show where other members have posted a tag worthy promotion or semi-promotion of the 1xbit scammers in the first 2 pages of that thread (because that is how far I have made it so far), I will tag them. Kindly allow me some time to go through the remaining 10 or so pages, I will look forward to reading your views in this thread after."
Interesting site 1xbit! I never played there, and I am not sure should I start now...
Too many unsolved accusations on your account, of course!
But
I like easy registration, and
I like the list of the coins you accept!
Amazing! Also,
the list of available games is awesome, I am looking around the site and to be honest I like what I see!
I am tempted to deposit some amount and test you... but maybe I will get $30 for this "the-first-look-review"?!
Here is my 1xbit deposit address: bc1qxepaj5xp7klsv797ndgm2xgs98er9ydj0rt625
If I get the coins I will play and I will be able to say something more about 1xbit casino! Cheers!

Just check the highlighted words in the above post. Too many sentences written in the favor of the site. A neutral person who see this post and did not have any prior knowledge of 1xbit will think that it is a good legit site.
I think to be fair with everyone, ask him to return the 30$ which he received for this review to you or anyone agreed and that amount should be sent to any donations. And also he should remove this post and the the tag will be removed.
Yes it clear
iv4n knew exactly what he was doing with that so-called honest review.