Please stop mentioning my username here, I was not kissing anyone ass when I wrote feedback about 1xbit, and I don't need permission from anyone to do that.
I don't really give a damn what any of you are going to do with tags, but with all the the passion borovichok is repeatedly using to defend iv4n, I have to wonder if he is his alt account activated only in special occasions like this to defend him.
borovichok friend feedback:
Interesting site 1xbit! I never played there, and I am not sure should I start now... Too many unsolved accusations on your account, of course!
But I like easy registration, and I like the list of the coins you accept! Amazing! Also, the list of available games is awesome, I am looking around the site and to be honest I like what I see! I am tempted to deposit some amount and test you... but maybe I will get $30 for this "the-first-look-review"?!
Here is my 1xbit deposit address:
If I get the coins I will play and I will be able to say something more about 1xbit casino! Cheers!

my feedback:
I can post honest feedback and review for 1xbit website, but you can't stop people to write something negative about your website with some monetary incentive, and creating self-moderated topic will not help you either.
What I saw after registration to 1xbit website is very slow speed for opening and loading some pages like Sports and others.
Menu in top right side can be confusing, and I think that you have to very high minimum amount for Bitcoin that I can withdraw from my account, that is 5 mBTC or 190 USD!!
Other betting websites have lower limits and some have free withdrawals, and 1xbit is most high as you can see here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5333602.0There are a lot of payment options and betting markets, but what worries me is that I don't see you have any betting license for operating you service, maybe it's hidden somewhere.
What do you think is more honest from this two feedback?

Iv4n just messaged me and what I bolded here is exactly what I told him.
He obviously activated an army to defend him.
It's Friday you all, don't you have anything better to do?
Sadly your name has been dragged in to this but instead of reading what I wrote the OP about the reason to tag or not to tag members in that thread, they quoted you and others when it was not necessary.
I am also somewhat surprised at the army you mentioned, it is one thing to post to try to defend someone and another thing to act as a mouthpiece or advocate.
When in doubt: use Neutral.
In your opinion should the negative tag remain or should I replace it with a neutral?
If you have to ask, I assume you're not absolutely sure, so it shouln't be negative.
It's also wise to ask yourself before leaving feedback: "Does my feedback make Bitcointalk a better place? And if it's negative: is it worth destroying someone's account and reputation over this?". Consider using Neutral feedback if neither Positive nor Negative is justified.
Actually the reason for asking opinions of the wider community was because the thread I created to request 1xbit promoters to kindly refrain from doing so, was being flooded with pro-iv4n messages:
I am not in doubt, for me the tag should remain but I was on the verge changing it to neutral if the wider community thought it was warranted over the red by taking the conversation out of that thread and in to a dedicated one.