Post
Topic
Board Reputation
Merits 1 from 1 user
Re: iv4n: Looking for feedback - should the negative tag remain?
by
JollyGood
on 24/09/2021, 14:49:56 UTC
⭐ Merited by lovesmayfamilis (1)
In this case (iv4n), JollyGood is unsure of what to do, which is why he started the topic to get opinions. Now that he has them, the majority is suggesting change to Neutral, so what's the point of starting a question thread if their opinions aren't going to matter?

Don't throw stones if you live in a glass house
I am not in any doubt. I think iv4n deserves a red tag and it should stay but just for the sake of not my thread about asking 1xbit promoters being flooded with pro-iv4n posts I created this and am willing to change the tag to neutral if the consensus shows it would be more conducive.

While I have your attention, can you sign your staked wallet address?

Code:
1jJLycZNJZc6eE79c8qpo3dmwaPH6DJd1

Code:
I'm borovichok. bitcointalk.org. 17.10.2017

Code:
H/cVWm2YjZxCCiBqsX7FbIh3BJ9vLS3ewRzONfPRzg5idwUUTIQpgG7guxnhJ5aUFKR7/gIq5O9mEGpAnHZI/u8=

Quote me please. Thanks in advance!


I hate humans.
Someone woke up after years of sleeping and than straight to defend unknown gambler in Reputation, oh how noble for someone who hates humans so much.
Well, the borovichok account woke up 3 weeks ago after having over 3 years of inactivity. Between April 2018 and September 2021 the account inactive and then goes over the top while defending a member that has obviously made a dubious post for the sake of just $30. I suppose can be seen as somewhat suspicious.

I have asked him to sign his staked address, let us see what happens. I think since the email address did not change after the waking up of the account it means he will be able to sign it but still, let us see if he actually does it: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=996318.msg23134907#msg23134907