The guy has written some great stuff for the novice farmer on subjects like electric fencing, low cost cattle rearing etc.
To keep the dollars rolling in he is now an expert on every fucking thing.
He starts out with a particular standpoint on a subject and collects "facts" that fit that premise and disregards those that do not. That's not how science or decent investigative journalism works.
A bit off topic I know but Bitcoin again proving its resilience and in the strongest position it has ever been, the long term outlook only gets better by the day.
I have been on several government research projects.
That's exactly how it works.
ie. the military wants us to evaluate this new radio that they're deploying to the soldiers to ensure that it can handle all of the comms during a theater sized battle.
First question: Does the government want the radio to be able to handle all of the comms?
If we go against their expectations we don't get the next follow on contract for the general's buddy's radio.