Well, I don't believe that a social movement has to have a formal organization behind it and this is proven by Bitcoin right now. Or we can say that Bitcoin is a decentralized social movement...that can be the right term. Now, if the idea is to have an organization behind it because it is a social movement, that will be against the very idea of Bitcoin itself so in other words it would be a contradiction in itself. Bitcoin succeeded because of the people who believe on it and this will be the same throughout its existence.
Bitcoin isnt a social movement by design, but it allows people to interact with trade freely, and see currency in a whole new way. The dollar is only successful because people believe in it, and people also just so happen to believe in Bitcoin. Social ideas dont have to be on purpose, sometimes things just fall into place.
