Yes, good idea, I have added it again:
Name (link) | Bech32 supported? | SegWit-Addresses (P2SH) identifiable?* | Usefulness (subjective rating ) | Rated by | Comments |
__________________________ | ___________________ | ___________________________________ | _______________________________ | ________________ | _______________________________________________________ |
Blockexplorer.com | No (09/2019) | No (09/2019) | 0 / 10 Points (avoid) | 1miau | Risk of getting your IP tracked, not recommended to use |
Then I will add it back too

However, I just spotted that instead of adding Wallet Explorer again you added Blockexplorer. The link also leads to Blockexplorer instead of Wallet Explorer. I hope this helps

Looks like I've copied the wrong line, should be fine now.

I quickly checked those that had "No" in front of them and found the following changes:
- Bech32 support
- Identifiable P2SH format
Updated, many thanks for researching.

- SmartBit halted its operations "
2 months ago".
- "Bitcoin.com (Owner: BCash)" redirects to "Blockchair.com", so we should probably just keep the latter one in the list!
I've created a
new category "removed" for inactive explorers, where we can keep moving inactive ones.
Found another explorer:
Name (link) | Bech32 supported? | SegWit-Addresses (P2SH) identifyable?* | Usefulness (subjective rating ) | Rated by | Comments |
__________________________ | ___________________ | ___________________________________ | _______________________________ | ____________________ | ___________________________________ |
Crystal Explorer | Yes (09/2021) | No (09/2021) | 0 / 10 Points | SFR10 | Because of the "team that's behind it", I expect it to be like "walletexplorer"! |
Added.
And yes, it seems to have a high chance of being a surveillance explorer.
Probably it's also generating revenue by reporting data.