The trouble is that the publishers are owned lock/stock/barrel by the perps pushing a lot of the eugenics stuff and they clearly have a license to flat-out lie if it serves the project.  We saw this first-hand throughout this scamdemic with very well established journals having to pull blatantly fraudulent studies which pretended to be getting high-quality tight granularity from rural hospitals in Africa.  Turns out the the 'scientists' performing the research were just fraudsters.  I don't remember the exact details, but there were a number of examples.

Similar problems afflict the organizations who can realistically host a lot of the potentially valuable research.  Scientists and academics know what they can and cannot find if they want to remain in the field.  And they know what findings will pay well.

I'm not saying that all research is wrong or there is nothing to be learned from even crappy research.  Indeed, when you read some of these papers, you can white-out the 'summary' and a sentence or two which the authors put in to cover their asses, and the rest is sometimes both valuable and in some cases quite damning to those who commissioned it.  The thing is, there is so much fraud and corruption that it's not really worth the bother to read it carefully because the uncertainty degrades it's value immensely.  In the task of understanding the world in a realistic way, it is simply much more valuable to use one's time elsewhere.