Isn't it always a word against word case when it comest to 1xbet? They have never provided any evidence of a violation of the terms of service, as far as I know.
As I said before, how hard is it to show evidence if a user is caught with multiple accounts? Other casinos did it.
After all, it is enough for such a user to say that this is not true and that this is not his account (the second) and the situation is still in the word against the word position. If 1xbit does not change its policy and sticks to the rules as till now, then unfortunately situations word against word will occur.