Probably. I'm curious as to what you mean by "post history review." They wanted you to look through their posts for... merits? Whatever its for, yes, that's particularly peculiar.
What got me was how often they both talk about what a newbie they are. They're still doing it.
I am also very new in the forum
However, my pattern of giving merit has not defeated the forum rules and besides I am a new Eva newbie striving to grow.
The very
first post by KingsDen was instructions on what newbies and older members should be doing. It was a plea constructed for merit right out of the gate.
Every post by either account is a gross attempt to suck up merit and devoid of original thought, but at the end of the day he's not hurting anybody so who cares. Kind of like RainbowCityDAO Guy.
If they were both enrolled in the same campaign that might raise some eyebrows but without concrete evidence, its not enough to confirm them as alts.
Here's an example of what I mean by "devoid of original thought":
Research on Bitcoin adoption in NigeriaThis post is just a long, oddly strung-together collection of other people's words. From the post:
Many young Nigerians are adopting bitcoin amid the crypto ban put in place by the Nigerian Central Bank. In fact, since the start of 2021, peer-to-peer bitcoin trading has grown to $204 million, the largest amount in Africa.
Data collated from Usefultulips, a Bitcoin analytic provider, shows Nigeria beats the rest of Africa combined on the use of bitcoin for p2p transactions.
That is directly plagiarized from
this article:

Despite his huge list of "references" (more like sources of copied material), he failed to mention the yahoo article the above-text is from, which means this is a pretty straightforward case of plagiarism.
Everything he ever did was for the sake of achieving merits.
