Right now we have a wallet server and some wallet proxies on the fritz, but we are working on it
ok, you accuse someone of hacking you and you are not being directly to blame for the lost coins.
So, what is next?
why you never officially showed up here?
why ignore your customers who want to know what’s going on with their money?
Can you write an official statement about the current stats of your service? not just ignoring.
what specifically do you do to cover the losses your users have? it is obviously your fault, it doesn't matter if you sell those Dogecoins or even if it is because of a hack, it is a security flaw and comes from your side.
In the previous post, user @idanzam complain about stucked MAZA withdrawal. This happened much after the critical hack, so it’s definitely not just a problem because of that hack. how do you handle cases like this, and I’ve seen a lot of similar complaints?
I feel like I have written this hundreds of times lately, but alright. Lets do it one more time.
Look at the confirmations as the coins rating.
A coin that requires a low amount of confirms is too expensive and not cost effective at all to do a double spend attack on.
A coin that requires a high amount of confirms can be double spent with just a few dollars and nicehash.com
Since all this noise Unnamed goes through these days comes from a double spend attack that resulted in Unnamed users losing Doge, why would we let weak source codes get a low amount of confirmations if that only means users like bitmaster1 and his followers can do it again?
Consider high required confirmations a hint to the developers to fix their shit before someone with bad intentions come sneaking from the shadows to make life hard for everyone involved in that coin.
The funny part is that instead of fixing their shit, we get called scammers because we take precautions.
Which makes me wonder.. those of you that scream scam over high confirmation requirements, why are you so mad? Is it because you cant afford to do the double spend magic on Unnamed?
And to the coin devs who refuse to listen and keep going with their bad diff retarget etc. I know some of you don't have a clue about the retarget function. What it means and what it does.
Others are aware, but don't know how to fix it.
Thats fine i guess, but don't expect to get special treatment if it risk getting Unnamed into another ciredo/petal situation.
Been there, done that and it will not happen again.. knock on wood!
The repayment process is going slow but steady thanks to trading fees and withdrawal fees.
Some other solutions to make it go faster will be announced soon.
My goal is to have the problem gone by the end of the year, but there is no guarantee since earning doge is not as easy today as it was 1 year ago.
And DaveF (from the o-holy thread that i don't bother to comment in anymore)
You are correct. Getting Unnamed shut down would only result in users not getting anything back.
I understand that is a wet dream for someone out there, so feel free to go all in on it.
But that says more about you than anyone else. That you quote bitmaster says even more...
Then to the fact that some of you guys support the guy who created this situation rather than reading through the proof that is all out there.. that makes me wonder..
What is your intentions in crypto? Support the scammers and destroy the ones with good intentions?
Bitmaster has a long history of ego tripping where he put himself in front of everyone else.
He states that he does it for the people, but the reality is that he's only doing it to feed himself.
Speak against him and he goes all in to silence you or even destroy you. Is that the crypto universe you want to live in?
Thank you for your time and have a nice day!
