Post
Topic
Board Reputation
Merits 5 from 2 users
Re: Do you think Lightlord behavior is acceptable?
by
Poker Player
on 14/10/2021, 17:19:26 UTC
⭐ Merited by LoyceV (4) ,Timelord2067 (1)
, as far as I followed there were three delays with payment for 7+ years. I tend to believe that there were serious reasons for that.

You have not followed it very well or you have not understood it well. Let me explain: there have been at least hundreds of payment delays. I was part of that campaign for more than a year and I was paid on time only once out of six or so. As Timelord2067 rightly points out, it is a campaign that still advertises weekly payments. So let's not repeat the falsehood that it has only been three times. There have been hundreds of times over the years and only three times the delay was such that people started to complain a lot and there was a ruckus in the forum.

Yes, I am talking about signature campaigns problems. I have seen the most attacks on lightlord because of it. I have never used these two casinos so I cannot say that I am competent to comment on their business.

Well you are only seeing part of the reality. These are all comments from the last page in the official bitvest.io thread:

...what's important on this thread is the hot wallet of bitvest and that should be the main concern ....

I am also looking for what actually happened to the hotwallet issue but no one seems talking about it...
(This is actually a laugh because there has been a lot of talk about it in the thread, the only thing that has been covered up by people talking about the signature campaign in that thread.)

even a loyal customer will get frustrated if they are waiting for weeks to get their withdrawal to be processed.

The main problem of the hot wallet is basically similar to the campaign issue. When the hot wallet is empty, lightlord seems to be very slow in refilling it so players have to wait for weeks before withdrawal is processed.

But hot wallet and the campaign payments can't be considered as same priority thing, I agree that everyone who is working with their campaign should get paid on time but it has very simple solution just let the campaign manager himself to proceed the payments weekly but handling the hot wallet can be tricky if he is busy amd still don't want to trust anyone.

In my opinion, hot wallet should be the first priority as it is related to their players who are their customers. They may lose their players based if the hot wallet issue is happening really often. As I said in other thread, lightlord should use an escrow for the campaign and trust the escrow to do everything related to the campaign so he can have more time to handle the casino.