Tell me, can any of your conclusions be drawn from your speech?
Because I can see it, that you say something pointless, without confirmed arguments.
Plenty of proof that most applicants are cheaters, spammers, etc - just look at their post histories and their trust feedback.
But based on your own scammy history I can understand why you would refuse to see that.
Of course it is easy to break down my every argument by paying attention to my trust rank. And it looks like that's all you can.
If you can do something more, use some real arguments. I would be happy to explain it to you and defeat you.