Actually I would be OK with it if yahoo managed the 1xbit campaign because he would probably kick your spammy asses out. If 1xbit is going to be here regardless of whether the community approves of it, that seems like the next best option. All you're really doing is confirming that yahoo was actually doing a good thing by managing the Yobit campaign.
So this means that you've no issues with the 1xbit site and campaign
No, that's not what it means at all. I think 1xbit is fraudulent and would never deposit money there.
What I said is that since the campaign is going to be here
regardless of what the community thinks, having a professional campaign manager could keep spam to a minimum.
So it never made sense to tag yahoo. I have no problems with all the campaign participants being tagged, however; neither do many DTs.
In the meantime you all continue to support a known scam site, all the while crying about something that was never really an issue to begin with. Well, enjoy it while it lasts I guess if that's your definition of pleasure.
As i understand your post, if yahoo is managing this campaign then following things will happen
1- Those who get participate in this campaign won't get tagged
2- The manager himself won't get tag
So how does this false accusation against 1xbit becomes invalid, when yahoo or any reputable member is managing it and selecting some of the users who have 5 merits in 120 days

BEWARE: 1xbit is a gambling website that is selective scamming users that deposit funds, withdraw funds and/or win.
All those participating in the 1xbit signature campaign are FULLY aware they are promoting a scam but continue to do it for the sake of pocketing some money - they cannot be trusted.