Let's be honest here; of course they don't care as majority of them are shitposters and they are aware that they wouldn't be able to join any other signature campaign that pays in BTC.
That makes sense (although I haven't looked at who's in the Bitvest campaign), and I was kind of wondering why members would continue to wear Bitvest's signature after so many weeks of nonpayment. That seems ludicrous in my opinion; I would jump ship as soon as I realized that delays had become the norm.
Everyone should exclude him from DT members
Why? The feedback lightlord left doesn't look terrible and certainly not abusive.
I agree, but it's not surprising that dkbit98 might not realize that inclusions/exclusions are supposed to be used to reflect a member's feedback-giving behavior, not as a measure of how much they can be trusted. It really is a baffling trust system we have on bitcointalk.
Is lightlord on DT by any chance? I know I've been here over 6 years, but I forgot how to check who's on DT2. If he is, in fact, on DT I think an exclusion would be warranted, regardless of what feedback he's left for others.