advertising money laundering schemes that have now been proven to launder illegally gotten funds for criminals...
Wait, are you talking about Bitcoin? Or maybe you're talking about fiat money or even just any kind of money in general? Aren't you a
gun advocate, despite knowing for a fact guns are used to murder people? Do you see the irony here, or should I call it hypocrisy?
Every user wearing the signature would be blasted with negative feedback, and possibly warning flags as well.
If you believe this is deserved, what's stopping you from tagging and flagging
all those users by yourself? It might not work out so well for
your diminishing DT status, but that's a small price to pay for doing what you believe to be right.
Then again, you also wrote this:
Paid signature campaigns ~ are making this community a really crappy place.
Lol. Look who's now advertising an online casino.
Good effort by OgNasty to raise the bullshit-per-post average for this thread
Don't be harsh, some of it makes a lot of sense:
Disgusting double standards...
analysis can be done to ensure any coin being mixed is not stolen.
That would mean 1 BTC ≠ 1 BTC! It means you could never accept a payment without doing an investigation, and the evidence of a possible theft (possibly far up the blockchain) could be weak. What if someone claims you stole the Bitcoin he paid you?
I'd say that's a terrible slippery slope to enter.