Bitvest has been doing this for YEARS. It's not something that has occurred just as a one-off or anything. And not to mention the hot wallet being empty issue that is more important than the signature campaign issue.
If that's true, lightlord should be given negative trust by DT members (I've already done so for the campaign mismanagement). Members can be trusted for years and then suddenly (or gradually) they're not. And when they're not able to be trusted anymore, their trust page should reflect that.
In addition, I really think people should stop participating in the Bitvest campaign, not only because they're promoting a site that's nearly into scam territory but for their own sake. Who knows when the next time lightlord is going to fall ill and be unable to make payments to his campaign participants for 10 weeks or more?
I'm not sure we can label them
lightlord and Bitvest&co as scammers. yes, he is often in the considerable delay of payouts, but we still don't have a clear case where someone has been harmed for money. all the complaints we have seen here, in the end, however, were resolved positively. (I’m not sure what would have happened without community pressure)
of course, the management and administration of the whole business are desperate. For example, running a low-quality level promotion through a signature campaign probably brings them more damage than benefit. I mostly don't even read posts
as far as I can see I am not the only one when I see Bitvest or 777 in user signature.
I didn't even get the urge to open their site and not to register there or use them. and it is certain that I would never recommend these two casinos to anyone.
its users should definitely be alerted to a slow withdrawal or any payments from there, for it may not be the basic problem but we cannot call it a scammer until it is clearly confirmed. there is a difference here in relation to 1xbit, Adkinsbet, betking etc...