Is xintensity 192 still the recommended value for miningpoolhub?
For nvidia it should be good.
Testing it now on miningpoolhub. The payout was lower than normal the last 24hours, but pool luck was bad as well. Ethereum difficulty has rised to new heights.
Previous tests show that higher xintensities are better. f.ex 400
Here are my results after running TBM 1.17 with xintensity 192 for more than 13+ hours:
835m [2021-10-20 06:57:14.476] miningpoolhub.com (ethash) PING: 57ms DIFFICULTY: 3.00 EPOCH: 448
835m [2021-10-20 06:57:14.476]
835m [2021-10-20 06:57:14.476]
835m [2021-10-20 06:57:14.476] ID BOARD TYPE TEMP FAN CORE MEM WATT kW/h COST/h
835m [2021-10-20 06:57:14.476] GPU0 3060Ti Cuda 62/0 70 1309 8142 153 0.15 0.01USD
835m [2021-10-20 06:57:14.476] GPU1 3060Ti Cuda 68/0 70 1560 8117 184 0.18 0.02USD
835m [2021-10-20 06:57:14.476] GPU2 3060Ti Cuda 69/0 70 1321 8117 153 0.15. 0.01USD
835m [2021-10-20 06:57:14.476] GPU3 3060Ti Cuda 57/0 70 1593 8142 183 0.18. 0.02USD
835m [2021-10-20 06:57:14.476] GPU4 3060Ti Cuda 67/0. 70 1385 8142 153 0.15 0.01USD
835m [2021-10-20 06:57:14.476] GPU5 3060Ti Cuda 61/0 70 1351 8142 153 0.15 0.01USD
835m [2021-10-20 06:57:14.476] 979 0.98 0.08USD
835m [2021-10-20 06:57:14.476]
835m [2021-10-20 06:57:14.476] ID BOARD HASHRATE/W HASHRATE AVERAGE SHARES
835m [2021-10-20 06:57:14.476] GPU0 3060Ti 426.20 kH/W 65.21 MH/s 65.21 MH/s 238/0/0 (100.00)
835m [2021-10-20 06:57:14.476] GPU1 3060Ti 353.21 kH/W. 64.99 MH/s 64.99 MH/s 228/3/0 (98.70)
835m [2021-10-20 06:57:14.476] GPU2 3060Ti 423.85 kH/W. 64.85 MH/s 64.91 MH/s 253/6/0 (97.68)
835m [2021-10-20 06:57:14.476] GPU3 3060Ti 356.24 kH/W 65.19 MH/s 65.19 MH/s 234/0/0 (100.00)
835m [2021-10-20 06:57:14.476] GPU4 3060Ti 425.63 kH/W 65.12 MH/s 65.13 MH/s 247/0/0 (100.00)
835m [2021-10-20 06:57:14.476] GPU5 3060Ti 426.30 kH/W 65.22 MH/s 65.20 MH/s 245/0/0 (100.00)
835m [2021-10-20 06:57:14.476] 2411.42 kH/W 390.58 MH/s 390.64 MH/s 1445/9/0 (99.38)
Going to change xitensity to 400 to see if that value is better on miningpoolhub.