About the rich, they do add value sort off during their investment in the country that adds to the GDP and increase per income to their employees. The employees are made responsible to their families as they paid and they take care of their children, send them to school, feed and provide shelter.
The rich also add value because of different types of taxes levied against them and their businesses. The monies being generated from that are used to provide social amenities to the people.
Likewise not all the poor are parasites. Some poor have good knowledge to be better but may lack capital to do something with their knowledge. The poor are employed in government and they develop good policy to the government, they are very dedicated to work for progress to the area of life they find themselves.
No, the "rich" parasite does not add any value by paying others. He is not creating anything for anyone. You do not understand the difference between money and value.
Please, read a bit more carefully and see if I say that all poor are parasites in any part of my post.
This is worth debating. Value depends on supply and demand, as long as people want money, it has value. So by giving other people money in exchange for their product, you are doing fair trading, how is that not creating anything for anyone?
The real question might be: Why people need money? Does money has value? And where is that value coming from?
By the way, if you want to eliminate rich parasites, then you should first disable private ownership of properties/land, since every land owner is going to do rent seeking and live forever on passive rent income. But if you remove the private ownership of properties, then you have communism society, no rich parasite for sure but lots of politic parasites