As you would say... "someone obviously has an obsession with me".

---

Rather than [thoroughly] defending myself, again, and be forced to create a wall of text, I'll try to summarize... ad nauseam.

.. hope it helps someone out there:
OgNasty: Begins advertising for a gambling site 1 week after I provided proof directly to him that one of the owners was helping a long-time scammer on this forum by giving them a ranked account to conduct more scams. After seeing him start wearing their signature a week later, and inquiring further (while expressing my disgust), he told me the money was too good to pass up.
suchmoon: Advertises for a site intended to help people's privacy when sending coins. Someone, unrelated to suchmoon, used this service to do something illegal.

For me, these are not similar situations. Og tends to find illogical comparisons he can use to attack, mudsling, deflect, or simply to elicit a response he can mock.. or all of the above.. he's good at it. *shrug*

^ Disclaimer: This summary is my objective stance on these members and their use of signatures. It is done without factoring the potential accolades (or lack thereof) each member should really be acknowledged for, or frowned upon.

Spoiler alert: When I do factor these accolades in (or lack thereof):
My level of trust for suchmoon goes up.
My level of trust for OgNasty goes down.

.. facts don't care 'bout your feelings.