What will the unnamed exchange representatives say about this? The allegations keep on piling up. What excuses will be given by unnamed exchange for this?

Why we accepted all those coins?
When Unnamed launched we offered listings to coins that had their glory days on Cryptopia.
Since many of them didn't have an exchange anymore, that was our way to get crypto back to the way its was when everything was good. You know, connecting the communities and connect with old friends from back in the days when crypto was fun and not too serious.
So sure, nobody says it was a great idea to add all the coins, but I can assure you that there were much worse coins that never got accepted.
But thanks to bitmaster and his double trouble, Tillkoeln has spent many hours this year rating every coin from good to bad. That must mean we are getting better, yeah?
But sure, high confirms on the worst coins makes us scammers. The alternative is a delisting, but where is the fun in that? Instead we started with high confirmation times so they could stick around without being a security threat to the exchange.

About Tillkoeln, he has made hundreds of coins over the years. His knowledge about blockchains is high enough to even make Satoshi look like a noob.
Now of all the coins he made or did updates on, he still have access to many of the repositories, because most people doesn't even bother to change their passwords after they take over.
Coins maybe even you hold can be trashed with a few clicks. Still he never did.
The amount of developers who sent him files that included the main wallet.dat with all the developer funds.. unencrypted.. still he never stole a single coin.
Definitely a scammer move, yeah?