How can you sure if binance was holding more than 83% from the total supply? 50% of BNB were going to the ico participants a few years ago.
https://etherscan.io/token/tokenholderchart/0xB8c77482e45F1F44dE1745F52C74426C631bDD52https://etherscan.io/token/0xB8c77482e45F1F44dE1745F52C74426C631bDD52#balancesit caused by BNB has so many utility use case instead of another coin. Didn't you aware about this? Do i need to show you the proof?
My point was about the holdings, look at doge and how everyone is suspecious about it because it's held by the devs.
I think that you must read about the binance tokenomic but it's not relevant again as binance has BEP2 chain and BEP20 chain. that means binance has two version at this time as native BNB and Binance smartchain. I guess those binance tokens were still on ethereum already swapped to the binance native chain or binance smartchain. that's why the total supply owned by binance on ethereum chain was increasing a lot.
i don't care how it happened or if it's from their exchange, holding 83% of a coin is very bad and it should never happen, i don't care about the justification if the result is the devs of the coin holding 83% of the coin.