The forum does not remove "inaccurate" information and does not fact-check posts. If you want to post where posts are fact-checked, you can go to Twitter, and you will find a place in which nearly everyone thinks the same.
Do you know that from experience or do you just assume it should be like that? Inaccurate information that stimulates a completely illogical and unnecessary discussion is definitely something I report, but always with evidence that confirms it.
There are a lot of people who have replied to the
thread you reported. This is prima facie evidence that it is not sufficiently "low-value" for it to be removed, especially considering the amount of merit received of those who have posted in the thread.
My value scale is set much higher than yours, and I don't think the number of merits is the only thing that defines someone as a quality member - it's much more important to recognize what a low-value topic or post is. Very few forum members have understood what is written in
this sticky thread.
Do you still think
"that it is not sufficiently "low-value" for it to be removed"?