The good thing about PoS coins is that you can earn income from them, which isn't the case with bitcoin.
How's that? It's not immediate, but you do earn bitcoins if you already have bitcoins, if you think about it. If those owned bitcoins allow you to purchase mining equipment and you're willing to pay electricity for those ASICs, then you've essentially created new bitcoins by owning bitcoins.
In PoS, one creates coins just because they prove they own coins. But, isn't the same thing with bitcoin, after all? Isn't computational power translated into cost which can be paid with bitcoins?
Many, biasedly, skip this.
bitcoin has a real cost of creation via the mining hardware. much like golds underlying cost is in gold mining costs
I've had this discussion with you in the past and you repeat this very mistake. The cost DOES NOT mean the minimum market value in bitcoin and thus, it is wrong to compare it with gold. Gold costs a specific amount of monetary units to be extracted from the ground and the buyer has to pay those at least so that it can be profitable for the seller. But, bitcoin DOES NOT have this specific amount. It's the way people evaluate bitcoin that determines the minimum cost of it.
And that's because no matter the effort, every 10 minutes, 6.25 BTC will be inserted into circulation. The demand and the miners' profit increase analogously (ceteris paribus).