Bitcointalk really needs two-factor auth at a minimum these days, and it looks appears it was a very savvy exploitation of previous PM messages to socially engineer a false transaction.
I'm not sure about that. Since the signature really does verify, it means minerjones was in possession of the XMR address in the message, and it appears the funds in question were sent to that address.
We don't actually know what happened without MJ's input. Am I missing something?
No, I don't believe so. Where is Minerjones
He cannot simply state he never received anything and wash his hands of this - I'm sorry but this is not right.
Man up and face the music - You've always been particularly shitty about that, so I'm going to leave you a neg soon if you don't reply.... FFS, this is a lot of money.