You state this action by VB was inconsiderate. But what was the initial reason to choose his address without consent? It seems like a very strange choice to send money to somebody and assume a contract where they handle administration, security and taxation for you, again, without consent.
YYes, there is a mistake here by the developer who succumbed to the general tradition of sending part of the created tokens to the VB address, thinking that this creates mutual trust and benefits the project. But it turned out that this has the opposite effect, the developer explains this step in an interview
https://www.gfinityesports.com/cryptocurrency/memecoin-sell-off-aidi-inu-vitalik-buterin-coins/ At the moment LP Aidi(ETH) is being restored and the project continues its movement, the launch of AidiCraft as planned will take place at the end of October.
Thanks for the additional information. I was not aware of this tradition, so I do understand the sentiment now. Anyway: The only really important is whether the leadership is actively working on recovering trust and funds. Reading your post, that seems to be happening at the moment. I'll be following this thread with interest!