There are two problems with this suggestion.
First, I agree from a marketing perspective Saylor is clever in his bitcoin promotion. I disagree that Saylor's approach is honest. In the hours and hours of interviews I've listened to, his marketing relies on telling half truths and misdirection to curry favor with the fiat maximalists. It would be the same for Monero with bitcoin maximalists. We would do well from a marketing perspective to adopt a similar approach with Bitcoiners, but it would rely on some degree of deception. I agree this is probably the optimal approach, but it will be difficult getting a decentralized community of enthusiasts to get onboard with this tactic. It works in Bitcoin because Saylor has such an out sized influence on the discourse. From what I can tell, Microstrategy has pivoted from business analytics to full time bitcoin marketing.
Second, have you engaged with bitcoin maximalists? Your avatar is from the WO circle jerk post, so I know the answer. I've tried to get friends and family interested in bitcoin. One look at bitcoin twitter and they universally recoil in horror. The gross bitcoin culture has been my biggest hurdle. Maybe you don't see it from the inside, but the levels religious cult like behaviour are off the charts including blind faith, heresy, and persecution of the infidels. The bitcoin inquisition is real. The pseudo macho personas are gross (shitcoins, carnivore diets, have fun staying poor, etc). Facts or logic have no impact on their beliefs. It's a big ask to suggest privacy enthusiasts try to engage in that pseudo religious cesspool.
It's a bit difficult not to feel offended by the above as you basically say I am in "insider" in the gross bitcoin maximalist cult because I have a Wall Observer hat.
I try to be a nuanced person. I typically avoid extreme positions, unless I become convinced that such a position is the solid truth. I am not a bitcoin maximallist (strictly speaking), nor am I a carnivore, although the keto diet was good to my waistline. I tend to be put off quite a bit by petty tribalism. And that is true both in the maximallist world you describe above, but I also find it sadly true when I see someone like yourself, willing to paint people with a broad brush just because of a forum avatar.
I also think the "maximallists" are right about a lot of things. Shitcoins, for example. There are VERY few crypto projects that merit a chance with or against Bitcoin. The top 10 is riddled with premined scams.
One of the types of scams is the one that paints itself as the project that is against all the "greedy NGU bitcoinners". This is exactly what I am warning against. Monero does not need to use that doomed energy. It is a worthy project, and one that will succeed, and has.