It kinda looks just like a list of users he doesn't like. In my opinion it doesn't seem substantial enough to be stickied. It's an arbitrary thread with a mere 5 usernames listed, most of which haven't logged in a while. No info or details, no nothing other than a list of random names calling them scammers. 2 of them don't even have flags on their account. I'm sure there's more than 5 scammers in the currency exchange. In fact, there's been hundreds if not thousands. Why is there only 5? What is the criteria to get listed on Nutildah's incredible list of scammers and is he going to keep it updated? Is he going to add to it? Is it going to be an exhaustive list of all bitcointalk fiends past and present or is it just going to be a list of a handful of random scammers/ones he's left feedback on? New threads should only be stickied if they're of high value and important and if I'm being honest that thread looks pretty lazy and largely useless to me regardless of who created it. Do you think we should sticky every thread that user's request or let everyone post their threads where they personally feel is best? I can create a thread with more than 5 scammers on it as I'm sure many others can. Both lists will help next to nobody if anyone at all. Scammers come and go and most of them listed have seemingly already gone so I'm not sure why a couple of people are clamouring for it to be stickied. It seems to be of little to no value to me, but Nutildah is free to add to it or expand it if he wishes, just as long as it's in the right place.
I didn't say it needs to be stickied. I asked why it's not fit to stay on that board if it's not substantially different from other warning threads on trading boards, including some that are stickied.
You're also wrong about there being no details - every username links to detailed posts that not only show why these users are scammers but also highlights all the red flags and warning signs users should look for.
I think if you're unable to judge whether a thread is substantial or valuable you should probably leave it as is. If that also means that Rambotnic's post stays up - so be it. Removing both and/or banning someone because of some misguided false equivalence does not seem right.