Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
No drama, but I think we are all waiting for a REAL up of BTC as He should do.
IMHO, He still look like a bit weak, if we are looking for a huge/massive UP by the end of year. Like on the spring time, where we got only "virgin" new ATH by 1K$ more than the previous, and just fake break out every time.
Obviously I prefer to be wrong, but we are still far away from the 2013 or 2017 moves.
HODL.
IMHO, He still look like a bit weak, if we are looking for a huge/massive UP by the end of year. Like on the spring time, where we got only "virgin" new ATH by 1K$ more than the previous, and just fake break out every time.
Obviously I prefer to be wrong, but we are still far away from the 2013 or 2017 moves.
HODL.
Well we could be getting resistance before $100k and also before $250k.. that's true.
We might not even be able to reasonably get above $250k this year or this cycle... but like you imply this cycle does not have to happen before the end of this calendar year.. so one of the advantages of not experiencing outrageous UPwards price movements, it seems a bit harder to justify that we are necessarily going to get a hard correction...
So for example if the BTC price went shooting up to $150k by the end of the year or $250k by the 1st quarter of 2022, $500k by the 2nd quarter of 2022 or $1.5 million by the 3rd quarter of 2022.. Any of those scenarios might be a bit too much price rise in too short of a period of time. As you seem to be suggesting (as one of the possible less bearish ways to read your post) is that so, far we do not seem to experiencing any of those blow off top like conditions.. even if we seem to be passing somewhat slowly through noman's land (between $55k and $80k)..
frustrating? perhaps?
This kind of stagnation going to shake some weak hands? perhaps?
Maybe a poll that suggest which one is coming first? $55k or $80k? I am not even that presumptive that $80k has to happen first - even if it does seem to be a price location in which we should not be getting too much meaningful resistance.. I might even claim victory early... like $75k - but surely I cannot claim victory at a mere $69k.. that is not quite enough in order to get meaningfully above our longer standing ATH of $64,895 and to use the UPpity fuel to at least get something closer to 25% higher than the relatively longer standing ATH rather than a peasily $69k - which is ONLY about 6.5% at most higher than our previously standing ATH of $64,895.
quote author=ErisDiscordia link=topic=178336.msg58398876#msg58398876 date=1636579558]
Outdated poll. How about this?
Would you support a protocol change which would allow "lost coins" to re-enter the ecosystem via mining after a certain period of time? If so, what period of time?
Also, ants are dumping. Ho-hum.
[/quote]
That does not sound like a very appealing poll topic, including that there are not too many bitcoiners who would seriously consider that to be any kind of meaningful problematic issue that needs to be addressed in some other way besides just leaving the coins... maybe we first would need to be convinced that those coins are somehow vulnerable or creating some kind of honey-pot attack vector in order to be motivated to attempt to do something about them.. and if we get over that issue, then the time issue would then come into consideration.. .
All bitcoins that are not moved for a certain period of time (20, 50, or 100 years) should be presumed lost and then recycled through the usual mining process. I'm not sure if that can be achieved through a soft fork.
FUCK YOU WITH A RUSTY PIPE FOR SUGGESTING SUCH GARBAGE.
but dude it is pretty much certain to get pushed in 2049 to 2069 time range.
and I can tell you human nature it will happen.
Oh gawd... another one of philipma's guarantee about how the future is going to play out - this time based on "human nature"
What a world?
What a world?
