I am a bit confused about that. they said that they won't accept accounts with negative trust unless the negative tag was because of them. yet I see account posting with their signature who were negatively tagged way before they started their first signature campaign. do they mean that they'll accept the account as long as it got negatively tagged because of them even though it already has a negative tag even before they joined their campaign?
It all depends on a specific campaign and on a specific manager, since there is a difference between a reasonable red tag and a red tag that has nothing to do with trading risk
(let's say, if users exchanged reciprocal tags for personal reasons). In addition, it is worth considering the fact that campaign managers' personal trust lists have been formed over the years, the lists that differ significantly from the defaulttrust lists,
(it is also worth considering the depth of trust). For example, I had a case when, out of resentment, I was unfairly marked with a red tag by one of the DT members, while this was just the moment when I applied to one of the campaigns ... But as it turned out, this user was on the manager's list of mistrust, so this red tag was not taken into account.