Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: 1XBIT.COM ᐉ 7 BTC WB ᐉ Altcoin Betting ᐉ no KYC ᕗ Instant payouts
by
Naficopa
on 12/11/2021, 03:43:40 UTC


I think @Reatim wasn't that there is anything wrong with 1xBit launching multiple signature campaigns. What he meant is that these campaigns are not effective. In my opinion, he is wrong. If signature campaigns had no effect, most cryptocurrency casinos would not have carried them out. Signature campaign is the most popular form of promotion on Bitcointalk, so I'm sure it brings relative results.

The signature campaign is great, it's great for gambling casinos or projects with good potential and reputation, it will enhance their potential and their reputation as well but promoting known scam sites will just ruin their reputation further, I don't know if 1XBIT is really getting a lot of good leads but what I'm sure is they are getting a lot of exposure as a scam casino.

It's true that through the neglect of Bitcointalk.org in the past, 1xBit is having a hard time rebuilding its reputation. But I don't understand your way of thinking.. Do you really think that 1xBit Signature Campaign has a negative effect?

Well that's a harsh word for Bitcointalk remember you're able to promote your scam casino and you're getting paid because you can post here, why not show gratitude by thanking Bitcointalk first and not accusing it, and about the negative impact we can start with your account

This is the evidence of the negative impact on your account alone


What are you talking about?
Of course I'm glad to be a Bitcointalk user. I am also aware of what my trust looks like.

I just would like to understand your way of thinking about signature campaigns (from previous post). Could you answer the question: Do you really think that 1xBit Signature Campaign has a negative effect?