There is another side to the coin ... if we knew that someone really needs money, and that person added a fraud warning to their sig, then they probably would have avoided the red tag, something in the spirit of what mprep regularly did with his sig, [he did not check the advertised projects but always took care of the disclaimer].
I am sure there are rules that campaign managers follow to prevent that from happening. But even if there weren't, I am sure such a participant would be asked to adjust his sig and get rid of the warning. If someone is willing to advertise a scam site, it seems paradoxical to have a piece of info that says "
be careful when playing on this casino because they might scam you".
Here is rule that ChipMixer has, for example:
7. Adding additional lines into your signatures is not allowed.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1935179.0If you are used to watching Laliga match, then you will be very familiar with one of these site (1xBET) because it is one of the sponsors of Laliga. But 1xbit is definitely a scam site where there are a lot of customers complaining about their service site.
They are sponsoring the Italian Serie A as well. Just open the official site (
https://www.legaseriea.it/en) and before it loads, you will see an ad for 1xBet for a few seconds before you are taken to the homepage.