Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Re: A Two-Round Proof of Work instead of PoW
by
larry_vw_1955
on 15/11/2021, 09:57:28 UTC
Quote
I think a solution would be to eliminate the PoW in the second round and simply make it a random selection (somehow). That would cut the expected block reward by a factor of N2, which would cut the power usage in the first round by that same factor.
Not sure on that. But why not just have a single round 1 and just select the winner at random without eliminating anyone? Why wouldn't that work?

The PoW job is also to maintain the Block Time at 10min. We can achieve that by just making everyone wait for that 10min minus delay/network broadcasting time etc.

Say round 1 only takes 2 minutes to get 100 miners. Then you just wait 8 minutes to select the "winner".  That's a 10 minute block time. So it saves 8 minutes of hashing. Less global warming.