Looking good with --xintensity 4096 on NVIDIA
users report good results with --xintensity 24 on amd cards. you can try that
Why did you switch back to default intensity 224 on nvidia?
2miners.com might have changed their code, try miningpoolhub, f2pool or nanopool.
When you read the 6hour statistics it's sometimes good and sometimes bad.
The new --miningtime option in version 1.25, can be used to find the optimal intensity settings for the pool you are using.
I am running a 18 hour test now on different intensities on ethermine. Might change the default from 224 to something else..
https://i.ibb.co/mrjX9KJ/tune-script.pngAnd the winner is --xintensity 284
xintensity 224:
minerspeed: 32.18 MH/s
Poolspeed: 38.82 MH/s 26.69 MH/s
xintensity 256:
minerspeed: 32.24 MH/s
Poolspeed: 34.56 MH/s 26.69 MH/s
xintensity 284:
minerspeed: 32.26 MH/s
Poolspeed: 37.61 MH/s 32.76 MH/s
00:01:00 [2021-11-13 18:37:14.078] GPU0 2060 CUDA 5 224 75/0 0 1182 7493 79
00:01:00 [2021-11-13 18:37:14.078] GPU0 2060 407.38 kH/W 32.18 MH/s 32.21 MH/s 32/0/0 100.00%
00:01:00 [2021-11-13 18:37:14.078] SHARES PER MINUTE: 0.54 POOL HASHRATE: 38.82 MH/s
00:00:59 [2021-11-13 19:36:18.066] GPU0 2060 CUDA 6 256 74/0 0 1185 7493 79
00:00:59 [2021-11-13 19:36:18.066] GPU0 2060 408.15 kH/W 32.24 MH/s 32.25 MH/s 28/0/0 100.00%
00:00:59 [2021-11-13 19:36:18.066] 408.15 kH/W 32.24 MH/s 32.25 MH/s 28/0/0 100.00%
00:00:59 [2021-11-13 19:36:18.066] SHARES PER MINUTE: 0.48 POOL HASHRATE: 34.56 MH/s
00:01:00 [2021-11-13 20:37:22.083] GPU0 2060 CUDA 7 284 74/0 0 1184 7493 79
00:01:00 [2021-11-13 20:37:22.083] GPU0 2060 408.79 kH/W 32.29 MH/s 32.31 MH/s 31/0/0 100.00%
00:01:00 [2021-11-13 20:37:22.083] 408.79 kH/W 32.29 MH/s 32.31 MH/s 31/0/0 100.00%
00:01:00 [2021-11-13 20:37:22.083] SHARES PER MINUTE: 0.53 POOL HASHRATE: 37.61 MH/s
00:01:00 [2021-11-14 03:38:16.095] GPU0 2060 CUDA 4 224 75/0 0 1170 7493 79
00:01:00 [2021-11-14 03:38:16.095] GPU0 2060 407.62 kH/W 32.20 MH/s 32.20 MH/s 22/0/0 100.00%
00:01:00 [2021-11-14 03:38:16.095] SHARES PER MINUTE: 0.37 POOL HASHRATE: 26.69 MH/s
00:01:00 [2021-11-14 04:38:21.095] GPU0 2060 CUDA 3 256 75/0 0 1167 7493 79
00:01:00 [2021-11-14 04:38:21.095] GPU0 2060 408.17 kH/W 32.25 MH/s 32.27 MH/s 22/0/0 100.00%
00:01:00 [2021-11-14 04:38:21.095] SHARES PER MINUTE: 0.37 POOL HASHRATE: 26.69 MH/s
00:01:00 [2021-11-14 05:38:25.072] GPU0 2060 CUDA 7 284 75/0 0 1179 7493 79
00:01:00 [2021-11-14 05:38:25.072] GPU0 2060 408.33 kH/W 32.26 MH/s 32.31 MH/s 27/0/1 100.00%
00:01:00 [2021-11-14 05:38:25.072] SHARES PER MINUTE: 0.46 POOL HASHRATE: 32.76 MH/s
[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]Hi! Tysm for this work. Few questions:
-Are the kernel tests ran long enough to be reliable? I can run it a few times back to back with it picking a different kernel each time. Thoughts? Can you clarify what the differences are between kernels? If it auto picks 8 should I let it run vs when it picks 3? Should I statically pick one? Naturally, I'm drawn to 8 because bigger must mean faster... or something.
-Any way you can test this on ethermine with a 3090 like you did on the 2060 with different intensities?
