Anyone in the bitcoin/crypto world knows that a court saying that a particular person is satoshi does not actually mean that is true. Most people are not in the crypto world.
This means two things: most people will be easy to fool with a court ruling and the more people get to understand how Bitcoin works, the less credibility Craig will have overall and the more of a fraud he will be known as.
He does no seem to get that he will be in a situation similar to OJ's, where being told and ruled as innocent does not make you innocent and this will even haunt you your entire life. Craig has already messed up his "facts" and "evidence" of being Satoshi WAY too many times. Besides his ego blowing up once a favorable ruling occurs, there is nothing he'll gain for it in the long run.
WSJ should be ashamed for writing an article like this. Attempting to get as many clicks as possible or not, they are giving Craig credibility which is a shame.
-
Regards,
PrivacyG