My additions about the bitcointalk hacks were deleted because the citations (from coindesk and others) are not considered reliable sources.
I have no qualms about Coindesk in particular but given most bitcoin news is grossly inaccurate, it makes quite hard to find a reliable (by their standards) source.
Fair enough I'd say, but would they consider a
post from the site admin to be credible enough? I'd like to think you can't get anymore credible than the website themselves posting information about compromises.