Re: [ANN][XCP] Counterparty Protocol, Client and Coin (built on Bitcoin)

Luke-Jr what is your opinion regarding the pull request offered by Peter Todd?

He has 5 pull requests open, none of which seem relevant to this discussion.

Quote from: led_lcd on March 22, 2014, 10:56:20 PM

Miners could still still make their decision on whether they wish to include such transactions in a block and Counterparty would use pruneable blockchain space.

Blockchain space is never prunable. Only UTXO space.

I don't know if it has been created yet. Please see:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=395761.msg5845721#msg5845721

Ignoring petertodd's slanderous lie there, I will reiterate why his idea is based on a false assertion:

Quote from: Luke-Jr on March 21, 2014, 08:45:24 PM

Reminder: transaction fees do not pay for transactions, merely attempt to deter/rate limit flooding. To cover the cost of transactions, transaction fees would need to be much higher and somehow distributed across all full nodes (not merely miners).

Wait for Zerocoin to boot BTC out.