'they won't move the 1.1 million coins',
Satoshi owning 1.1 million bitcoins is a weak guess, I don't understand why people keep repeating it as if it is a proven thing!
Whale Alert: We were able to make the most accurate estimate of the number of blocks mined and bitcoins owned by Satoshi
https://whale-alert.medium.com/the-satoshi-fortune-e49cf73f9a9bAnd I say, that is not weak and not a guess. It is a perfect calculation, because Satoshi marked these blocks not only with the Nonce values but also with several other characteristics like timestamp, timedelta (between own blocks), ExtraNonce, ...
Yes, we can't say '100%' Satoshi mined them, but if you
do your own research and understand what Satoshi has done, then one can say '99.9999999999%'.
...
By the way why are you even focusing on P2PK outputs that each contain a small amount of bitcoin compared to reused addresses that do contain thousands of bitcoin and are the same as far as "knowing public key" goes?
Because after all the research, I know that Satoshi is the owner of these coins. And if there is a possibility to move the coins, someone will do it. What will happen? Nothing. Satoshi will let us to move the coins. You don't believe it? Then we have to wait until someone will do it. (And we will see the reaction of the market, but it will be temporary.)
What will happen if someone moves the coins of the mentioned
reused addresses that do contain thousands of bitcoin? A lot! I would not try it.
They are even less secure, because instead of just "knowing public key", you also know a lot of correct signatures, where d-value is the same. That means you have a lot of "d=(s/r)k-(z/r)" equations, so a lot of "d=number*k-number2" expressions.
So?
ECDSA: Revealing the private key, from four signed messages, two keys and shared nonces (SECP256k1)
https://billatnapier.medium.com/ecdsa-revealing-the-private-key-from-four-signed-message-two-keys-and-shared-nonces-secp256k1-5758f1258b1dhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ssTlSSIJQE