Wow... 

I had not even noticed that thread (list).. It's like the BIGGEST stretch of imagination to attempt to find some kind of connection between various members who are quite obviously not hardly connected (except that they are members that you may well not like).. and perhaps some loosey goosey subjectively random criteria, no?   

You surely have the right to make lists of the members that you do not like, and then perhaps to attempt to find out if anyone responds or goes along with you... 

To me, it seems that it should undermine the credibility of any member to be making such an exaggerated claim that hardly makes any sense or has any ability to be true.  Think about it.  You will get way more credibility for any kind of claim that you make if you do not exaggerate.. but whatever.. you do you.

I am not saying that exaggeration does not have any role in terms of argumentation - but it seems best to be somewhat strategic about it rather than just making claims that you are have almost no ability to support.... I suppose that you could elaborate on each member that you list and give more detail why you do not like each one... maybe that would help you to get some responses in the thread?   As you know, that thread/post is nearly 23 months old.