Seems like a big so what to me.

My first year and a half or more on the forum I was not involved in any signature campaign, and I did not even know what they were.. but then I learned about them, and I wore two or three signatures for about a year and a half while receiving payments in bitcoin... ..

I am thinking that maybe I wore betcoin.ag for a year or perhaps a little less than a year?  I am not sure about the exact dates, but all those campaigns were paid in bitcoin, and I thought that it was interesting to be able to earn BTC and not really change any of my posting behaviors.. but yeah.. you are considering that my judgement was shown to be impaired by getting involved in that?  I am not as pure as the driven snow as I had been implying myself to be?  right?

I am thinking that I had been posting in the same way before and after I had joined the betcoin.ag signature campaign.. but then I discontinued with wearing any signature of any campaign in early 2017.. and maybe betcoin.ag had discontinued its signature campaign.. I cannot recall exactly..... and my overall time of wearing a signature was relatively short-lived.. and I felt that it really did not affect anything substantively in my posts.. even though I got paid (which I suppose you are suggesting that I was morally/ethically compromised?  perhaps?  perhaps?  I might not want to run for office, either, right?).

but yeah maybe there could be some questions regarding the wearing of signature campaigns..... 

I had heard a bit about some possible scam accusations that had been directed towards betcoin.ag and yeah my profile was red tagged about half-way during the time that I had been involved in wearing the signature but wearing a signature is hardly involving myself in the operations betcoin.ag or even attempting to figure out if there might have been some valid scam accusations.. maybe there might have been some need for me to be some further vetting or due diligence, no?  I am not sure.  I don't have any such information in front of me now, except that you are wanting to make it an issue, no? 

At a certain point, I started to consider that it probably was not a good idea for me to continue having any kind of involvement in any signature campaigns, and sure you may be correct to imply that I might have considered it better to have looked into that kind of a service more before wearing such a signature.  Perhaps?  perhaps? 

Did you want to get distracted into such a topic? 

Do you believe that my involvement in the betcoin.ag signature campaign has any kind of meaning that might relate to any of the support of you guys in BSV shitcoins?  I am having some difficulties regarding what point you are wanting to make.

You might be right with some of the implications that I don't feel any encumbrances now, and geez I did not really feel myself to be much of any kind of promoter with betcoin.ag beyond wearing the signature.. .. so hm?  is there some kind of relevant issue at this time?  You probably need to be more specific if you believe that there is something meaningful/substantive within your vague accusation.