Re: [NEM] NEM -New Economy Movement - No Envy Movement - Updates+Discussion thread
so, i read what you are saying, correctly.
You say that,
because sockpuppets were not anticipated to be such a problem,
and because the devteam decided to deny them access to this project on a date later than the announcement
then socks should be accepted, because they were accepted in the beginning.
is this correct?
do you need to correct my statement anywhere, to reflect better what you are saying?
Let me repeat it, for the record, with less words. Please corret me if i am wrong somewhere.
Because socks where not stopped on day 1, they should be accepted.
If socks are not acepted, then the devteam is not fair.
Do the above two lines reflect your issue, or do you need to correct it?
You say that,
because sockpuppets were not anticipated to be such a problem,
and because the devteam decided to deny them access to this project on a date later than the announcement
then socks should be accepted, because they were accepted in the beginning.
is this correct?
do you need to correct my statement anywhere, to reflect better what you are saying?
Let me repeat it, for the record, with less words. Please corret me if i am wrong somewhere.
Because socks where not stopped on day 1, they should be accepted.
If socks are not acepted, then the devteam is not fair.
Do the above two lines reflect your issue, or do you need to correct it?
No, the issue has nothing to do with what I think, it's all to do with interpreting UP's statements, like the one below. I've said enough - obviously
- why don't you read utopian's statement below and try and point to anything that justifies naming and shaming people who created multiple accounts prior to Jan 29. "I won't prevent multiple buy-in. It is impossible to prevent people making two- three accounts and register for them. But it won't matter much as our user bases would be huge. Furthermore, it takes time to make multiple accounts. It takes time to manage multiple accounts. Later on you would need to provide me passwords on these accounts. That's a lot of work already and if someone can go through all of that they have shown a lot of interest in NEM and probably deserve their stakes. And at this point, more accounts means more development fund to NEM. So I don't see the need to prevent multiple buy-in. It is very different from someone putting 10.000 NXT in and buy 10% stake of NEM. I very much doubt anyone can have more than 5-6 buy-ins. I hope this explanation clears the worry about double buy-in."
edit: I'm just the messenger