Hello. I understand your interest. Open my name is necessary for trust for you.
The quotes you mentioned is regarding GRN coin times (sha-256), all GRNs with no value was converted to GREEN (with filled liqudity) and some users successfully swapped on ETH in ethereum than on polygon blockchains.
We planned this swaps(to recover all GRNs to GREEN) one month only, while node of GRN still runned. All participants with GRN was filled with GREENs.
The changing rules - is just a decision not spend money from my pocket. All previous members get their bonus as mentioned before.
Game with dice and ponzi - was completely fail experiment with 1-2 users and transactions below $0.00001
Its history exist - its history has no problems - its clean.
I failed to see how and why the "variant" of the token I'm talking about and quoted matters. Just like your ponzi, what matters and proven by the quoted texts is not whether your "experiments" failed or not, it's about your post history and the intentions behind it.
You claimed to be a clean project, but you tried to lure investors into a ponzi scheme, where we all know the last person will suffers loss, as well as being very discouraged by the forum.
Please amuse and inform me, what's your definition of a clean reputation?
The truth is any token, any coin, any stock and even Fiat - is Ponzi, sir. ) I'm clear with myself to name things as it is. What is also clear, that that code of those dice was open sourced and each person can view it.