Maybe "Allow the bad posters to continue doing bad things" is your default response, but some of us would prefer it if the forum was slightly nicer than a cesspit.

Honestly, I don't get it.  Are you being contrary for the sake of it?  Or do you have a vested interest in opposing improvements?  I want to read topics that promote healthy discussion.  If someone approached you in person, face to face, and quoted an article verbatim and then said nothing else, would you engage them in conversation?  Or would you assume they had suffered some form of brain damage and conclude they need to stop wasting peoples' time?